Cycle News

Cycle News 2017 Issue 08 February 28

Cycle News is a weekly magazine that covers all aspects of motorcycling including Supercross, Motocross and MotoGP as well as new motorcycles

Issue link: https://magazine.cyclenews.com/i/792390

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 80 of 113

2017 HONDA CRF450RX VS. YAMAHA YZ450FX SHOOTOUT P80 The Honda CRF450RX mimics much of the way KTM converts its motocross bike into a closed-course off-road race bike. The KTM XC line softens the suspension settings, goes with a bit bigger gas tank, adds an 18-inch rear wheel and a kick stand, then leaves well enough alone. The engine and ECU stay the same as the motocross models and KTM doesn't have to mess with adding electric start, their motocross bikes already have it. COMPARO IN THE DIRTO Neither the YZ450FX nor the CRF450RX are light bikes. The motocross bikes from which they are bred do not have electric start as standard, so adding the magic button tacks on a chunk of weight, then the 18-inch rear wheel and kickstand bump up the weight with both bikes. With full tanks, they both weigh in right around the 265-pound mark. As a reference, the 2017 KTM 450 XC-F weighs 238 pounds with a full tank of gas, too. Yikes! Honda and Yamaha go differ- ent directions with the suspen- sion spring rates in order to ready the bikes for off-road. The Honda CRF450R is softer in the back while Yamaha goes softer in the front. For general off-road riding and the average rider, the handling is pretty darn good on both bikes. When the speeds pick up, the Yamaha suspension, especially the fork, is a bit soft, making the bike a little nervous at speed and dive under braking. Bigger, heavier and faster testers no- ticed the soft fork more than our average testers. The YZ450FX with a full tank of gas weighs a whooping 267 pounds on our scale. If you keep the FX moving and flowing it doesn't feel crazy heavy; the heavy sensation kicks in when speeds drop and the trail becomes more technical. The FX is a wide-feeling bike and like the motocrosser, front wheel traction is a bit vague at times, although the FX front end feels just a bit more planted thanks to the softer fork springs. The weight of the FX is also more noticeable due to the slightly un- balanced and soft suspension. Weight is a major concern with both bikes. They are significantly heavier than their European counterparts.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Cycle News - Cycle News 2017 Issue 08 February 28