Cycle News

VOL. 53 ISSUE 44 NOVEMBER 8, 2016 P115 the end of the ensuing straight, because it allowed a less com- promised throttle opening. The other was to mess up the ideal line, giving choices of different ways to take the corner and, in theory, more overtaking opportunities. They must have had F1 in mind, because for the bikes, that final hairpin has never been particularly lacking in this area, and many races have been decided last time through that corner. Although not this year. But it makes one think about developments that instead of getting closer to perfection, are actually aimed in the other direc- tion. Like making worse tires, a not infrequent suggestion over the years, with the intention of mak- ing the racing more entertaining by giving the rider more to do. The idea being that if the tires lost grip early on and everyone was sliding around, it would en- courage a special kind of riding skill and reward the spectators, as opposed to the sterile sight of one-line corners and smooth perfection. There might have been some merit, for at one stage, the sug- gestion at GP level was inspired by the supposedly more enjoy- able world superbike races, then running on control Pirelli tires that fell short of the performance of the Michelins, Dunlops and latterly Bridgestones developed almost race by race in a costly grand prix tire war. One proponent was this year's star Cal Crutchlow, recently moved over from SBK, and having a rather torrid time with tires that gripped so hard that if they did let go they'd precipitate a massive high-side. He pre- ferred a lack of grip to having too much. Another is the notion of put- ting all competitors on not just the same engine, but a relatively humble production unit, lack- ing such racing refinements as highly tunable fuel-injection and so on, and (more importantly) without cassette-style gear- boxes with a multiple choice of ratios. Make it fairer, and ease the burden on both riders and mechanics. That one actually happened in Moto2, where sleek full-race chassis are draped around porky CBR600 engines, in a lower state of tune than those used in Supersport 600. A good idea? I have always thought the oppo- site—the bikes are over-tired and underpowered, no recipe for greatness. But Moto2 does have its fans, especially among team managers who don't have to pay for exotic engineering. Then how about dumbed- down electronics? That's an- other one that has happened, with MotoGP teams all using not just the same Magneti Marelli hardware, but this year also standardized software. On bal- ance, it's contributed hugely to closer racing. But detracted as massively from any role racing might have played in meaningful electronic research. Here's one they haven't done yet, although it too has been spoken about at high level: adding weight ballast to slow down riders who win too often. It would have to be done either race by race, or more fairly by accumulated championship points. The more you have, the more lead sinkers are cable-tied to the chassis. Marquez would need a big concrete block. If that really worked properly, then all riders would end up the season on equal scores. And wouldn't that be wonderfully fair? A bit like clapping leg irons on the best dancers in the Bolshoi ballet, to make it a bit fairer on the clumsy ones. Thankfully it hasn't happened. Yet. And that crazy tip-tilted final hairpin at Sepang? Actually it turned out okay. After all, that sort of thing happens on real- world roads, too. And anything that makes tarmac racing more relevant to the real world can only be a good thing. CN

• Cover