Cycle News is a weekly magazine that covers all aspects of motorcycling including Supercross, Motocross and MotoGP as well as new motorcycles
Issue link: https://magazine.cyclenews.com/i/1542398
CHICANEEY
Bv HrHxv Rav
AsRAi^s
f
ust
Say
No
fyour elephant
has hemorrhoids,
you
don't
fit him with a
training bra. At
least most
people wouldn't.
But our
friends
in AMA Pro Racing
in Picker-
ington,
well, they're
a different story
The Al'4A Superbike
ChampionshiP
has more
problems than a hemophiliac
with
a
porcupine fetish, but
that isn't
stopping
them
from ftying to fix
problems
that don't exist,
By
narrowly focusing
its wave band
to
a station
that
plays
'All
Me" radio,
the
somewhat
fluid Pro Racing
hierarchy is
receiving bad
broadcasts about
the state
of the Superbike
paddock. What's wrong?
Where ro stan? The schedule.
class
simi-
larity,
track safery
the leadership s tin
ear,
rrac!ion control,
etc. So
what's their
response? Spec
tires!
The
gruel
they're
being
fed, is that it
must be
a
good
thing because
it works
in
World Superbike
and it works
in
Canada.
Canada?
The argument
misses
one
salient
point -
the Af4A
doesn't
need it.
Spec
tires were
introduced
to
World Superbike
for one very
good
reasoni
Hichelin was
winning every-
thing
on their
own very narrow
very
selfish terms. ln
2003, the
year
before
the
advent
of spec tires,
lt4ichelin sup-
plied
two
riders,
Neil Hodgson and
Ruben
Xaus. Between
them,
they won
20 of
24 races
and would
have won
more if not
for a crash by
Ruben Xaus
at Laguna
Seca. Hodgson
won the
World Championship.
At the time,
Dunlop was
supplying
tires
to 20
riders. Pirelli fitted three
or
four and theywere
back ofthe
packers.
The spec-tire
debate
came to
a
head at the
U.S. round
of the
World
Superbike
Championship
when
World
Superbike
organizers
FGSport
announced
that the 2004
season
would be run
with
spec tires.
ln l'lonterey,
they said
they had
the outline
of
an agreement with
Pirelli
and a bid from
Pirelli
that they had not
accepted. and were
waiting
for bids from
other
companies.
Before
the following
round at Brands
Hatch,
Pirelli sweetened
their bid,
and, as there
was no
counter
bid, FGSport
signed
and announced
the
deal
in England,
14ichelin
wouldn't
have been
interest-
ed
-
goinS
from two riders to
an enlire
field isn't something
they
do - but Dunlop
would
have been. The
Brummies
claimed
at the
time that
they were not
invited to
bid.
FGSport say
that they
had meetings
with
all tire
companies
-
denied
by some
- all ofwhom except
Pirelli told them they
weren't
interested. Legal
action
may still
be ongoing,
but
after nearly three
years of
spe. tires. it's a
moot
point. The contract
expires at
the end of this
year
For races and officials
tests. Pirellitires
and suppoi-t are supplied
by FGSport
at a
cost
per rider of 45,000 euros
(about
$57,000)
for the season.
lt is believed that
the
top six teams
from the
previous
year's
points
standings
didn't
pay
the
first
year, but as to who
pays now that's
r.:p to
Fcsports. Pirelli
supplies tires,
FGSport
determine5 who
pays what.
One
team from each
supplying
bike
manufacturer
is designated as a test
team,
which is unsatisfactory
to both
the teams
and Pirelli.
With Winston
Ten Kate, the
official Honda
team,
Alex Barros's Klaffi
Honda team doesn't
get test tires.
The FIM
rulebook says that at
each
event, l3 rear and
nine
front tires will be
Tires are
the reason,
according to Repsol
Honda's Nicky Hayden.
"That's
where
a lot of time
comes
from,"
he
said.
ln the United States,
l4at Mladin's
Pole
time from
this
year's
Road America
was
over three seconds
faster
than his 2003
rime.
His fastest race lap,
which
was
faster than
his
pole
time,
was 3.5 seconds
better
than his best of
2003.
The difference
is clear.
Progress is
being made
here and
in MotoGE and to a
much
lesser extent in
World Superbike-
Essentially,
they're
trying to break even
after three
years
of
development.
The improvement
in Mladin's
times has
much to do
wtth tires,
as well as engrne
and
engine mapping.
When
Michelin
came
in to
support the Ducati
Austin
sole supplier
Does last
year's lndy F-l
race ring a bell?
Dunlop supplies an allocation
of tires
and
service
to all of their teams,
and many
others.
HotBodies Racing's/Mat
I'lladin
Motorsports Marty Craggill
gets NTs, as
does
Hooters Suzuki's
Eric
Wood and
Doug Chandler
in his return-
lf the teams
go over their
allocation
-
all of them
do -
they have to
pay.
So
it's concei\rable that,
dependinS on the
fees charged,
the factotT
teams could
spend less on tires
than they
do now.
They'd also
get less. And imagine
whar
would happen
if
the
private teams
were
asked to
pay
$50,000
for tires?
Or
the backfleld support
teams,
who would
also have
to
pay.
The
Srids
would be much
smaller.
And this
is regardless of which tire
comPany won the contract.
And
what of the occasional
priva-
teersl Part-timers
would
have to
pay
thousands
of dollars
for
tires.
You
want
small
fields? There's
your
solution.
Count I'lichelin
out.
Same for
Bridgestone.
lt would be
between
Dunlop and
Pirelli.
DunloP, if
Siven
the
chance,
would be an
active bidder.
They've
supported
racing for too
long,
had too much success,
and
developed
too many
tires for both
racan8 and
stTeet use
to
gave
up
without a fi8ht.
But if they won the
bid, the
quality
of
the
tires would
suffer: they cenainly
couldn't supply
every Superbike
and
Superstock
bike with
NTs.
Ben
Bostrom
is the only rider
in
the
paddock
to experience
all sides
of the
argument.
He's been both
a l4ichelin
and Dunlop-supported
rider in
World
Superbike,
he raced Pirellis
lasr
year
for a downmarket
Honda team, and
he's back on Dunlops this
year.
"Dunlop's
been
the one that's supPort-
ed the sport so
hard, it wouldn't
be right
[if
Pirelli
was chosen]," he said.
"Right
now
we have a
spec-tire
rule, so it wouldn't
make any difference
because
everyone
runs Dunlop
and it works
great. lf every-
one
runs Pirelli
it would be the same
situ-
ation,
iust
on
Pirelli. RiSht
now it's like we
have a spec-tire
rule. I
got to admit,
it's
pretty nice. lt's
pretty
nice because
yott
kind of know this
is what I'm
given.
You're
not
goin8,
'What's
that other
guy got Up
his sleeve?'
You don't
know''
Who
srands to
benefit?
Pirelli, if they
won the bid, would srgnrficantly
raise their
American
profile. They
would
also
raise
their
profits;
this
would
have to be a
money-making
deal. And it
would surely
make
money for the
Alt4A, who
would
administer
the deal.
And
where would
that money
go?
More elephant training
bras.
CN
allotted
to each
Superbike rider
for
prac-
tice.
qualifying, Superpole,
and warmup. ln
Supersport,
it's l0 rears and
eight
fronts.
So
how has
it worked? Three
years on,
Hodgson still
holds the
laP record at
Valencia.
HodSson's race
lap in 2003
was
a l:35.007.
Troy Corser ran a
I :35-374
in
the second
race this
year.
Troy Bayliss'
race
record, Superpole, and
best
lap still
stand
at Misano
from 2002. Shakey
Byrne's Brands
Hatch fast
lap remains a
record.
And much of the
improvement
in
World Sr.rperbike
times comes
from the
engine and, mostly,
engine
management,
not
rubber.
Compare
rhis ro MotoGP
Valenrrno
Rossi's
pole
in
2005 was
nearly three sec-
onds faster
than his 2003
pole.
The
fastest
lap
was
a
I :52.623
run by Loris CaPirossr.
ln
2005, Capirossi again
had the
fast lap, a
l:50,195,
a time
that didn't match
the
exiled lt4ax Biaggi's
l:50.117
from 2005.
team in 2003 and
2004, Dunlop
stepped
up. Two
technicians and an engineer
com-
muted
from lheir
headquarters
rn
Birmingham,
England,
Dunlop develoPed
the NT
(New
Techoology) line
of tires,
which continue
to be
the standard. And
rhey continued
to
win nearly even/
ra

