Cycle News is a weekly magazine that covers all aspects of motorcycling including Supercross, Motocross and MotoGP as well as new motorcycles
Issue link: https://magazine.cyclenews.com/i/143872
~ ~ sacramento"ReROrt: C'l 00 ree 0') ...... ... ...... l!':l ~ Q,) ..c e Q,) ~ c, Q,) V'J f· fo By Bob Ham "Now is the time when men work quietly in the fields, and women .weep softly 'in the kitchen; the legislature is in session, and no man's' property is safe." Daniel Webster is erwise contact their S~nators .a nd Assemblymen. The lobbiest retained by these groups swung into action andspentthenexttwodayspleading with key legislative leaders to spare the.OHV FU!1d from this attack. T~e le~slature finally approved the bill WIth only $8.5 million being taken from the OHV ~oney. . In the meanume, the Budget BIll still contained language which would ~ncel an $8.5 million project at Ocotillo We~ls and tral"!S£er the money appropriated for this ORV park t.o the General Fund. Eventually this money transfer wasAc1eted ~rom .the ~udget, but the pn:)VlSlon which eliminated the Ocotillo Wells p~oJe~t ~emamed and for now that project IS 10 trouble. : The Bud;get Act, besides the provisions mentioned above, also provided the money to begin work on the Syc. amore Canyon proi,ect in San Diego County. S far funding only provides for an environmental impact reJX?rt, but a favorable report could provide an. i~portant step. towards making this Important project a reality. SB2056 by Senator Alan Robbins: This bill was introduced in the wake ofpassageofABI253.Manystatelegislators were outraged at the blatant "raid"on the special funds which were part of AB1253. Senator Robbins introduced the is bill to ensure that the $8.5 million which was taken from the OHV Fund would be paid back as soon as .possible. The bill sailed through the Senate without a single negative vote. It went through its first policy committee in the Assembly, again with no opposition. The bill then went to the Assembl y Ways and Means Committee, chairman by John Vasconcellos and was killed. Vasconcellos said that he had never intended the $8.5 million to be a loan in the first place. (Despi te the fact that he circulated a letter to all members of the legislature, prior to passing 1253, which clearly characterizes it as "loan.") Senator Robbins was allowed to have 'SB2056 amended to eliminate the $8.5 million repayment provision, and it subsequently was sent to the Governor with only the provisions which would authorize a loan to a local fair board toconductanORVFairattheHungry Valley ORV Area. This loan had been previously included in SBl961 by Robbins, but had originally failed passage in the Senate. credited with uttering those • l;I h ~ords In 18.71.. Per aps ma!1Y In the off-reading community have uttered similiar thoughts 18 since the start of the latest two year . session of the California Legislature which ended shortly after midnight Aug.31. . This latest session will be remembered by off-readers for the continuing attempts to divert the Off-Highway Vehicle Fund to pay for pet projects of the administration. The session hopefully may eventually be remembered in a brighter light, if the ORV user group sponsored bill to reorganize the OHV program in the state works the way it IS hoped it will. This session there were some seven bills including the 1982/83 Budget Bill which directly affected the ORV Fund ABi14 by Assemblyman John Vasconcellos: This bill was passed in 1981 and was designed to "bail out" certain special funds which the legislature had spent more money than was available in the funds. In this particular measure, the OHV Fund was tapped to loan $1 million to the Energy and Resources Fund. This money was returned to the OHV Fund on July I of this year as part of this year's Budget Act. AB85! by Assemblyman Howard Berman: This bill was passed in 1981 along with AB1l4. This bill would have authorized all remaining money in the Green Stickie Fund (OHV Fund) to be loaned to the Department of Parks and Recreation to pay for projects authorized by thel980 Park Bond Act. The money was supposed to have been paid back after a buyer was found for the Parks Bonds. As it turned out, a bond sale was consummated prior to the transfer of money, so this bill became moot. AB125! by Assemblyman John Vasconcellos: This is the one which had the off-roading community up in arms. This measure originally would have transferred $17 million from the OHV Fund to the General Fund. The objectionable provisions of the bill only surfaced the evening before it was to go to a vote on the' Senate and Assembly Floor. CORVA became aware of the amendments and enlisted theaidof AMA, the Four Wheel Drive Association and the San Diego Off-Road Coalition to make phone calls, send telegrams and oth•• •• ••• • • • • ••• • • 9 ••• • • ••• • a • •• · · . · · · ·· ·· · · · _ · · · ••••••• SBl548 by Senator Ray Johnson: This bill would provide that 50% of all fines resulting from tickets written by park rangers on state park facilities would go to the State Park and Recreation Fund. Existing provisions of law specified that fines resultingfrrim tickets written forORV violations would go to the OHV Fund. CORVA, along with M.O.R.E. president Russ Sanford, brought this problem to the attention of the author, and the bill was corrected so as not to interfere with the existing ORV provisions of law. The bill is now waiting the Governor's signature. A1I85! by Assemblyman John - LewiseThis bill would have allowed persons applying for "vanity"1icense plates to have the surcharge be placed 10 the OHV Fund rather than the Environmental Fund. The bill was killed in the Senate. Besides those bills dealing directly with the OHV Fund, there were several other bills considered this session which are of importance to ORV enthusiasts. For instance: . AB2!97 by Assemblyman Bruce Young: This is the bill which was drafted by the combined forces of virtually every ORV Group in the state, including the dealers and the indus- . try. The purpose of the bill very simply is to put the State's ORV program and money in the hands of those who best understand the problem and the needs ...the ORV users. This bill, now on the Governor's desk awaiting his action, will place much of the control over the ORV program under a seven-person ORV Commission. Day-to-day operation . of the program will be handled by the Division of Off-Highway Vehicle . Recreation, which will be under a special Deputy Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation. The implementation of this bill could prove to be the most beneficial act of the legislature with respect to ORV Legislation since passage of the original Chappie-Z'berg Act of 1971. SB1264, by Senator Ken Maddy:This bill appropriates $35,000 to conduct a study of the suitability of purchasing some 40-50.000 acres in west Fresno County for a major new state ORV riding area . . AB!!54 by Assemblyman Ingalls: This bill raises the. fee which DMV charges to process a change of ownership request from $3 to$15. This was not meant to single out ORV owners, but merely puts them in line with fees which were passed last year for all other vehicles. This bill is also awaiting action by the Governor. AB!270by Assemblyman LaFollett: Will allowORVs with Green Stickies .. __ _~.p.3:.r!'nI ?p.p'~~l.i~ !l!~~~?! pubto lic parking lots. Also with the Governor awaiting his 'signature. , AM059 by Assemblyman Floyd: This bill was sponsored by the motorcycle dealers 10 an attempt to slow down the high rate of theft of street Harleys. The bill will place tighter regulations on the sale of replacement engine cases and frames. It was .another of the hundreds of bills which were sent to the Governor during the last week of the session. AB2606by Assemblyman Kapiloff: This bill was also sponsored by the motorcycle dealers. It clarifies the role of the New Motor Vehicle Board when it comes to non-street legal motorcycles. According to the dealers, consumers of off-road motorcycles and ATVs will have more comsumer protection. The manufacturers say that there will be more consumer protection. The manufacturers say that there will be less competition in the sale of off-road bikes, since they will have more difficulty establishing "ATV only" or "Dirt-bike only" dealerships. If you have any strong feelings on one side or the other, the appropriate place to write is the Governor's office, since this bill is also in his hands. And in conclusion, here's a couple of bills which might have been important to you if you ride street bikes. They won't be important this year because they didn't pass, but in case you were interested, they were: AB996 by Assemblyman Floyd: This is the current session's version of the perennial "helmet law " . Happily, this latest version of "big-brotherisrn" got no further than previous versions. seRA74by Senator Robbins: If you are a state worker and own a motorcycle you might have liked this measure, had it passed. It simply would have asked the powers that be within state government to devise a formula to reimburse state employees who chose to use their gas-saving motorcycles rather than the family gasguzzler when going on state business trips. This measure did not survive the Assembly Ways and Means Committee. The Committee Chairman, . John Vasconcellos, (if you remember his name in connection withother bad news legislation mentioned above, you've been paying attention) stated something to the effect that he did not want state employees riding around on "murdercycles" while on state business. Well that's it for 1981182...or almost it; there is still talk of a special session reconvening right after the November elections. Until then, at least, the legislature remains in recessand your property (and your special fund) is a little safer. •

