Cycle News - Archive Issues - 1980's

Cycle News 1986 12 10

Cycle News is a weekly magazine that covers all aspects of motorcycling including Supercross, Motocross and MotoGP as well as new motorcycles

Issue link: https://magazine.cyclenews.com/i/126939

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 47

America's motorcycle newspaper Volume XXIII: Number 48 Sharon Claylon, Publisher Mike Klinger. Comptrolkr Skip Johnson, Associate Publisher! National Sales Manager Jack Mangus, Associate Publisher/Editor Rheba SmiLh, Circulation Manager Carolint' Gendry, Executive Secretary to the Publisher Editorial Kit Palmer. Associate Editor Paul CarrutherS. Associate Editor Farren Williams, A.J.fociale Editor Mike 1..d material is sujbect to revision as is necess~ry in the sole disaction of Cycle Nev.'s. Unsolicited materiaJ which is not used will be relUnled if accompanied by a seH addressed s.amped envelop:. All unsolicited material will be handled with reasonable care. however. Cycle News assumes no rcspon· siblity for the safety, loss or damage to such mate~ia~. Reprinting i!" wholc?rpart only by permU!slon o~ the I?u.bhsher: Advertising rates and clrculauon mformanon wiU be sent upon request. See S..R.D.S, Copyrigh~CycIeNew•• lnc.1986. Trsde· mark Cycle NeW. ,.giatered U.S. Patent Office. All rights .....rvod. 4 ON THE FRONT PAGE: The Nikon of Henny Ray AbrBms caught Malcolm Fo'rbes' HarleyDavidson balloon, while Kit Palmer's Nikon clicked the pic of the Harley-DBvidson Low Rider Custom. How Cranston could lose The recent guest editorial "How Cranston Won" By Dave Holeman was appreciated. Even though Dave stretched the truth a bit, hi point is well. taken. Aware voter turn-out is ~n essential part of protecting the mterests of motorcycling, a part that apparently only we can make happen. The Cranston problem sure didn't take care of itself, or just go away. Yes, we a II need to stay on top of who our elected officials are. And how to contact them. It's good if you ever contact them at all, but sometimes we need to do so in a big hurry to let our feelings and interests be known. One easy way.to find out who these people are is to call your city hall and request the names and phone number of the following: Your senators (who deal with issues at the federal level), state senators, congresspersons, and assemblypersons. They can also provide you with county supervisors, etc., should you have a local problem. No city hall? Call your local chamber of commerce as they also know. Now diat you have names and numbers, call these offices for accurate and current addresses of same. This. can also be considered prerunr:ung the phone numbers in preparatIon for battle. But at the same time, even Senator Cranston's office will be polite to you if you are polite to them. You can't reason with peo· pIe by screaming at them. It is to our advantage to project a positive image. Go ahead and scribble while you are on the phone, Then make a somewhat organized list of all this acquired information. Put it where you can find it, even if that means in your tool box. The next time the bureaucrats threaten our sport, as well as our civil liberties, you will be armed with valuable knowledge. .Ye~, Sen~tor Cranton is trying to stIck 1l to hiS own state (California) at t~e federal level. That is why we kmdly request all Americans to contact their respective senators to voice opposition to Senate Bill SB2061. If Big Brother gets away with shutting down southern California by simply labeling it a "wilderness area:' then a very dangerous precedent has been set. What part of the country do the eco-freaks go after next? The Colorado 500 could be history within sev-eral years, for example. And to add insult to injury, the term 'wilderness' in most cases, if not all, would be a lie according to Webster's Dictionary. We can't say it enough, if you are of voting age, then do so. Register to vote. When you move to a different - address, re-register. Even though Cranston won. the senate race, perhaps we, theo[l·roading public, made a difference in the Cranston vs. Zschau match. H nothing else we made Cranston sweat when Zschau took the early lead. When Cranston went on to pull-outan 11 th hour victory, by a rather slim margin, maybe be g-ollhe message that he's not as popular as he thought and that a great many Californians are mad as hell about what he. is doing with SB2061. Unfortunately, there were not enough of us at the polls to make the ultimate differ~nce.. Evaluate the situation. Put it in your own words and terms. Think about it. Have you ever noticed that sometimes when you're riding how easy it .can be to really think clearly? Even Lf you're racing? Makes ya wonder. When the banner's up and I look up and down the start line at the competition, I see a defense of the true pioneer spirit that made this country free. That's what our great sport means to me. This is something worth protectmg. We can do something about the problem of politicians wanting to shackle us out of existence. At least in (his country we still can. We must stand up for our rights. We'll never know unless we try. TOM MARSHALL Canyon Country, CA Right on the money Dave Holeman was right on the money in his guest editorial (Cycle News, Nov. 26/Dec. 19). We blew it in November at the polls. Yes, I wrote letters. You read lhem in Cycle News and (can I say it?) in Dirt Rider. Yes, I voted - for Ed Zschau - and tried to make my voice heard in the place where it really counts! Apparently not enough other riders made thee((ort to do either. I hope th!'-t somehow, somewhere, somebody WIll get us off our collective butts and get us organized. Apparently it won't come from theAMA. Maybe the Califorma Off-Road Vehicle Association (CORVA) will come through. Or another Phantom Duck will,appear. I'll keep trying ,to do our part. What are the rest of you guys doing? LYNN DOUGLAS HOWELL Walnut, CA The issue is money This is about the renewed helmet law controversy in California. I have sent a similar letter to Assemblyman Richard E. Floyd. I personally wear a helmet. I like to see my friends wear helmets, because they:re ~ore likely to stay around awhile if they do, and that' would make my life better. But I feel that people must be allowed to take risks that don'tendanger others. Not wearing a helmet is just such it risk. Part of the issue is individual freedom. It's a short step from requiring helm~ts ~o saying it's illegal to go walkmg m the desert in the summer, because every year people do and die as a. direct result. Many other things are m that category and could be similarly controlled. Rock climbing, scubadivmg, motorcyling itself, could all be prohibited in· the name of the social good. And where from there? The other part of the issue is the so-called social responsibility problem. Let's consider that objectively for a moment. Let's consider only the money, because that's the issue. There's a lot of talk about the expense of medical treatment hat" must be picked up by the state when a helmetless rider hurts himself worse 'than hewould have if he'd been wearing a helmet. Two big numbers are getting completely ignored. One is the amount of money that gets spent when a helmet wearing rider survives 'an accident, with terrible and expen· si.ve inj1;ITies, that would surely have killed him had he not been wearing a helmet. He may become a ward of the state for life because he had a helmet on. The second missing number is ~he amount of money that gets saved, m a sense, when a helmet less rider ~e~s killed instead of surviving with mJunes that would cost the state a lot of money. . This sounds morbid, but remember the issue is money. If someone doesn'; like this argument, it's not the money they don't like, it's the human side. That's not the cost to society; but speaks rather to the other problem the queslion of whether we should prevent people from taking risks. If we're going to consider the dollar costs, let's be honest about it. No statistics I've seen address those missing numbers. When they are taken into account, we might even see that it would save the state money to ban helmets. I certainly don't advocate that. The point is, we don't know what the dollar costs are, because no one's looked at the entire issue. I'm happier to see anyone wearing a helmet, because she/he probably has people that care about her/him and they could be longly saddened by a minor accident. I would like to see everyone equcated about the fragile· ness of the brain and the protection helmets provide. But it must remain an individual choice. As for the dollar costs, people like to quote figures that support their feelings, but so far no one has looked at it objectively. JAMES BRADLEY Los Angeles, CA Loose cannon rhetoric It appears that it is Mr. Holeman's bel ie£ that motorcycling is endan· gered by the reelection of Senator Cranston to another term of office. What an extrordinary perception! His recent guest editorial certainly leads me to believe th;:tt it is much more endangered by the likes of Mr. Hole· man, standing on soap boxes! His style and views represent to me' th.e most embarrassing excesses of the fr.mges of the motorcycling fraternity, (and, coincidentally, reminds me of tbe tone of the recent Sena torial campaign in California!!). His 'Ioose~nnon' rhetoric is potentially injurIOUS to everyone, both inside and outside of the sport. Any outsider, assuming that his violent diatribe typifies the general. opinion of us all, can only have hiS worst fears confirmed!! . Fo~tunat~ly, I know there are many m thIS busmess who are not tied to his tangenti;:tl 'sling-shot' opinions. We are not going to be 'buried' by those categorized by Mr. Holeman as 'bums'! We are going to continue to succeed by operating our businesses and our lives with a rational, open mind, aware of all the changing factors that mfluenceevery day. In fact, they area SIgn that there are slill opportunities to create, and not just phantom ene· mies to blame for our own shoncomings. I counter the restrictions or controls on riding areas by doing all I can to make sure my customers their families and friends, ride respo~sibly and safely, and respect with more care the areas we do have, rather than abuse the areas wedon'talways need, Personally, I have little problem with . a 55.mph limit if it extends the longevity of even a small number of my customers! [ also understand tbe simple relationship between cost of repairs, the irresponsibility of riders and insurance rates. I also trust motorcycle magazine edi tors not to get (Continued to page 17)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Cycle News - Archive Issues - 1980's - Cycle News 1986 12 10