Cycle News - Archive Issues - 1970's

Cycle News 1972 09 19

Cycle News is a weekly magazine that covers all aspects of motorcycling including Supercross, Motocross and MotoGP as well as new motorcycles

Issue link: https://magazine.cyclenews.com/i/125800

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 45 of 59

... '" m ii ~ en ~ ~ w 13 >- U by Maureen Lee The AMA computer blew its cork again! I don't know what kind they '1Se but I suspect it needs a good dose of salts, as they say in Blighty. This one is a gas. Remember how I complained a few weeks back about the time it took 'em to return my renewal: four and a half weeks? Well, how this one for size? I renewed husband Gene's card early in August. Just two days ago, I thought to myself, well, here we go again. We got the card O.K. yesterday, along with a very nice letter from a Hog rider in Pittsburg, PA. I must admit they did the cards off in decent time, just under two weeks, but Pittsburgh, PA. ain't Long Beach, CA., and Jim Proie got both of them but only one ten year pin. Since it is his tenth year too, he naturally kept it. Official correspondence will follow, not that Cene really cares a hoot about that pin. It's the principle of the thing. But, oh dear, AMA! However, doesn't the incident prove one thing, that motorcycle people are great people? Instead of either destroying Gene's card or shipping it back to Ohio, Jim took the time to send it on to Gene. We all seem to take care of each other. . Got a report that the Beatty Grand Prix was great although at the last minute they weren't allowed to use the roads through town. They even had a chopper to hover over the course and there was no way anyone was going to cut course. Lees use one at Elsinore next year! D';st trails in the wrong places show up very clearly from the air. Now that the Ascot Half Mile Championship has been chawner to buy fire insurance. Unfolt !1& ~~1Yi . ~,lh:e c!everly-<>rchesttated' slogan no-fault Within the context of twentieth century American government exactly three things are necessary to eliminate any given freedom: a power base, one or a few dogged legislators, and a suitable slogan. The power base is some formal or info~ group that thinks it will gain by surpressing the freedom of others, and its function is to agitate for the legislation prop sed to do this. Some power bases are economic in origin - a corpo\ation, an en tiTe industry J a group of employees, a type of specialist, etc. and such groups always seck exactly the same thing: monopoly. Whenever an economic group feels that it is not getting as much income as it thinks it deserves, under conditions of voluntary buying and voluntary selling, it becomes interested in putting an end to the economic freedom of its customers and suppUers, forcing them to do business on its own terms. The other mllin kind of power base is what might be called an authoritarian group; these are less interested in coercion as a means towards some rational, objective goal like economic MOtCORCYCLE TBIIS'DBI BUIT S8000.00 in Prizes! Sunday, October 1, 1972 Lucerne Valley, Ca. Partial Prize List Ycamahca 150 EndulO YGfMhG Mini-EftChNo insurance" is deflecting nearly all the victims from this key issue. By appealing to short-sigh ted greed and to the secret, immoral yearning to evade responsibility for one's actions, NFl promises Non-responsibility for Injury. Even a usually perspicacious commentator like Frank Conner, in the July issue of Cycle, allows himself to be diverted into a jungle of irrelevant items, like how much N FI would cost motorcyclists, and ends up minimizing the point that motorcyclists are being legally compelled to buy insurance. This is exactly as if the footwear industry got a law passed to legally compel every man, woman and child to buy a certain number of pairs of shoes each year. As long as automotive insurance operated under the 1443-year-old tradition of civil law stemming from the Code of Emperor Justinian there was a plausible excuse for legally compelling people to buy insurance, liability insurance, so that they would be able to pay a judgment issued against them for injuries they caused. Such provisions strengthen personal responsibility, and help to assure that a person can be effectively held fmancially accoun table when he is morally and legally accountable. Take away the notion of accountability, and there is no difference between forcing you to buy insurance on your Honda, or on your home, your horse, or your hi-fi. .-\lIow me to predict what will happen when Non-responsibility for Injury becomes universal. There will emerge, slowly at first, then more rapidly, a growing awareness of automotive games, like buying a $50 junker, fixing it up so it will just run, and then sideswiping a line of parked cars to see how many you can graunch in a single pass. At first everybody will be amused by this sort of thing, and will happily turn to their insurance companies for the costs of repairing their damaged cars. But premiums will soon mount and there will be growing "concern" from both drivers and insurance carriers that Something Must Be Done. Civil liability having been cast aside, what will happen is a strengthening of criminal laws so that what are now accidents - lacking malice and pre-meditation and intent to do harm - will become crimes. What are now handled as civil injuries against another person will come to be handled as criminal offenses against the state. Auto drivers now know that they can pretty well evade criminal charges by claiming, "I didn't see him", when they deliberately pull out in front of, or tum left in front of, or crowd off the road an oncoming motorcycle. The one thing they are likely to be stayed by is the possibility of a large civil damage suit against them, which could cause loss of their liability insurance, or a great hike in its cost. With this possibility removed by N on.responsibility for Injury, motorcyclists will become fair game. The most probable response of the government will be to outlaw motorcycling on the grounds that it is too unsafe. It will, of course, become absolutely impossible to park a motorcycle' between two parked cars. The car driver will know that there is absolu telv nothing to stop him from smashing into or knocking over the parked bike with tank-like, federally·required "safety bumpers". Why should I go to all the trouble of cutting back-and-forth to get Ollt 0 Y ~ ben I e .ia;s1; (Please turi! to PC' 47)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Cycle News - Archive Issues - 1970's - Cycle News 1972 09 19